🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.